Tony, The disease (based on SNOMED) and medication coding (whatever they are calling it now) are both in progress ..."real soon now"
Michael Tony Lembke wrote: > > On 01/03/2007, at 8:39 PM, David Guest wrote (in an ironic tone) : > >> They're good aren't they? >> > > Actually, David (and David), I agree with Michael and think the standard > is much needed and appropriately comprehensive. > As well as providing a standard for referrals, it would appear to set up > possible standards for e-prescribing and for a basic EHR. > The sample referral (Chapter 4.2) demonstrates a subset of the complete > set tha includes most of the usual fields a developer would require for > implementation. > I'm unclear on the subject of disease and medication coding - the > standard specifies data type 'Codeable Text', but the sample uses plain > text. There is no field that I can see for indicating what > classification system is being used. Perhaps someone else gets it. > > Regards, > Tony Lembke > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
