Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
a common question is "is this going round doc?" and that can't be answered except out of my head at present. there is no added input from the other 5 docs here on that point obviously if each one of saw one person with a rare condition, we'd still think it was rare, but 6 could still make a significant cluster.
i'd considered that idea about 5 years ago - with a centralised repository for infectious (and not merely "notifiable") diseases, transmitted to the state health repository
too obvious and useful, so it never progressed ash _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
