Cedric Meyerowitz wrote:
Greg
If the government wants my data, they must pay for it.
Cedric
Cedric,
I don't especially think they want your de-identified data, I think what
they really want is for divisions to start building the capacity to
aggregate data, which was part of the original rationale for funding
IM&T in divisions and through the PIP.
The DNIMP proposal addressed GP incentives to get them involved, but the
whole submission by AGPN was rejected by DoHA, leaving divisions on
their own. Not a pretty picture as we have to do it on our own, with the
vaguest of guidelines at present.
Do you feel you get anything of value from your division?
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
