Tim Churches wrote:
David Guest wrote:
Oliver Frank wrote:
snip
Who is TL and what are you trying to tell us?
That only you and I care that the progress in encrypted medical
communication is glacially slow. The Feds don't care, the industry
doesn't really care and any IT consultant is only interested in getting
paid for completing the work it's commissioned to do. They don't
actually give a rat's if it all comes to nought.
I care, David, as evinced by my many long and impassioned posts to this
list and its predecessor on this very subject over the years. But I am
damned if I know what to do about the current situation. And if I did
know, no-one would listen to me anyway. Or to you.
Tim
When I say only Oliver and I care, by this I mean, all clinicians for
whom the current impasse in efficient electronic communication is a
problem every hour of every single working day. We are interested in
this for purely selfish reasons. It will probably make us more money. We
are willing to tolerate better patient care as a side effect.
I grant that epidemiologists are on a higher plane. They are interested
in things like improved health care, more effective use of resources and
all those other left wing, pinko, commie things that they go on and on
about.
Geoff says we should put up or shut up. While the talk here over the
years may have had an influence on the digiscenti, it's hard to argue
with th
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
