David Guest wrote:
It's a dog eat dog world out there.
Of course the Feds could take a leaf out of their own book (http://www.adgp.com.au/client_images/104183.pdf)
"Budget summary
Investment of $947.1 million over four years to tackle the growing burden of disease and improve the delivery of health and medical services to those people in need.

Chronic and complex conditions – supporting patient care $291.3million
snip

* $34.6 million to allow an additional 800 general practices to
participate in the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives program
(to 1200 practices participating)."

snip


Oliver, as you more than most will be aware, coopetition (http://www.worldwidewords.org/turnsofphrase/tp-coo2.htm) is all the rage these days in medical circles. This is reportedly working well in the NHS in the UK (the one true bastion of capitalism) where significant improvements in health care management are taking place. They have succeeded in taking the lessons of Edward Deming and the American quality improvement gurus and applied them to health care. This process has largely been a failure in the US where small government and larger medical conglomerates are loathe to divulge their internal business practices. Australian medical practice sits somewhere between the Scylla of laissez-faire medical care and the Charybdis of total government control and the Feds are willing to give coopetition a run.

Perhaps once NEHTA gets out of the road, the Feds can sit down with the MSIA and see what might be achieved. (A common data format / exchange???)


David
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to