On 22/06/2007, at 10:45 AM, David Guest wrote:
Peter Machell wrote:
Division's recommendations to get all their sites onto the most
popular system seem quite selfish to me, they should instead be
lobbying for interoperability and recommending the best package
for each site, on a case by case basis.
Peter
I have an interest in interoperability. Bearing in mind the
proprietary nature of database schema, do you think it would be
possible, and would there be interest in, devising a Common
Electronic Health Record format for Australian GP held medical
records.
Possible - easy.
Interest - from whom, the vendors?
It should be a government mandate, and if they were capable of
efficiency it could be done by wiki and completed in a short
timeframe, with the input of the vendors and interested parties like
those on this list.
We live in hope. PG 4 PM, then maybe we'll see some innovation in
government.
cheers,
Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
