At 3:44 pm +1000 9/7/07, David Guest wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
Greg Twyford wrote:

Colleagues,

This from recent PHCRIS conference:

 <http://www.phcris.org.au>


GP & PHC Research Conference Abstracts 2007

Effect of computerisation on quality of general practice care-a
comparison with quality indicators

I suspect that this study may fall foul of the "ecological fallacy" -
that is, the analysis is of aggregate measures of care (eg how many
HbA1cs are done on each GP's set of patients) but it is drawing
conclusions about the quality of individual patient care. Such analyses
are prone to potentially misleading mistakes
I was invited to contribute to the collection of BEACH data a few years ago. I declined because they wanted to collect the data on paper. How antediluvian!

David


I was invited to collect data for BEACH recently. I declined because the data collection is *still* on paper and no signs of it going electronic anytime soon.

Seeing that I already collect most of what Beach needs, electronic could permit me to participate for small additional time cost. Double data entry is not worthwhile to any busy GP.

What was written in what Greg posted reflects the likely truth - that computerised GPs running recall and reminder systems, etc probably do better on acheiving management targets. Naturally one would expect that using a target measurement/feedback system will achieve process improvements (which might be called "quality").

Measuring proper outcomes comparing routine computerised vs paper practice is still something that hasn't been done (well not anywhere in the world last I looked a couple of years ago).


Ian.
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to