I was going to ask about this, I recall it being mentioned about "grandfathering" and also having mixed deployments.
Would that mean you could per TB license one set of NSD servers (hosting only 1 FS) that co-existed in a cluster with other traditionally licensed systems? I would see having NSDs with different license models hosting the same FS being problematic, but if it were a different file-system? Simon From: <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>> on behalf of Daniel Kidger <daniel.kid...@uk.ibm.com<mailto:daniel.kid...@uk.ibm.com>> Reply-To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Date: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 at 12:36 To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Cc: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Strategies - servers with local SAS disks The new volume based licensing option is I agree quite pricey per TB at first sight, but it could make some configuration choice, a lot cheaper than they used to be under the Client:FPO:Server model.
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
