I was going to ask about this, I recall it being mentioned about "grandfathering" and also having mixed deployments.
Would that mean you could per TB license one set of NSD servers (hosting only 1 FS) that co-existed in a cluster with other traditionally licensed systems? I would see having NSDs with different license models hosting the same FS being problematic, but if it were a different file-system? Simon From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Daniel Kidger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 at 12:36 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Strategies - servers with local SAS disks The new volume based licensing option is I agree quite pricey per TB at first sight, but it could make some configuration choice, a lot cheaper than they used to be under the Client:FPO:Server model.
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
