I assume you are making the joke of external LROC. But not sure I would use external storage for LROC, as the whole point is to have really fast storage as close to the node (L for local) as possible. Maybe those SSD that will get replaced with the fancy external storage?
-- Cheers > On 19 Apr 2017, at 23.13, Aaron Knister <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 4/19/17 4:05 PM, Simon Thompson (IT Research Support) wrote: >> By having many LUNs, you get many IO queues for Linux to play with. Also the raid6 overhead can be quite significant, so it might be better to go with raid1 anyway depending on the controller... >> >> And if only gpfs had some sort of auto tier back up the pools for hot or data caching :-) > > You mean like HAWC but for writes larger than 64K? ;-) > > Or I guess "HARC" as it might be called for a read cache... > > -- > Aaron Knister > NASA Center for Climate Simulation (Code 606.2) > Goddard Space Flight Center > (301) 286-2776 > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > Ellei edellä ole toisin mainittu: / Unless stated otherwise above: Oy IBM Finland Ab PL 265, 00101 Helsinki, Finland Business ID, Y-tunnus: 0195876-3 Registered in Finland
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
