On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marc, > > off-the-list you have posted this example: > > https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk > > > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate lines > > That is a tough problem. > > If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street > you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free and > accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this area can > be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we > currently do not support area routing, it should not be that hard to add: > https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82 >
It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the same. This weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it there as well. > > > > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would > be nice that the name of the street would taken. > > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the street-relation > to bring all parts together. > > Do you have a link to that schema? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap (in German) regards m
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
