The cases I'm thinking about are like number 6 on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen So it might be best to keep them as cycleway=track on the main street in those cases.
regards m On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the links! > > This is really complex matter when I think more about it. As the street > itself could be too dangerous to pass or with a fence to avoid > (bike/pedestrian) crossing > > Peter > > > > On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote: > > BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this topic on the German > mailing list as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei Bordstein > Trennung" [1] > it is more general than what I was asking for. > > regards > > m > > [1] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> off-the-list you have posted this example: >>> >>> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk >>> >>> > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them as separate >>> lines >>> >>> That is a tough problem. >>> >>> If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to the main street >>> you should map it as one or more connecting streets. If there is a free and >>> accessible area between the cycleway and the main street and this area can >>> be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map it as such. Although we >>> currently do not support area routing, it should not be that hard to add: >>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82 >>> >> >> It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not the same. >> This weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. I'll try to discuss it >> there as well. >> >> >>> >>> >>> > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it would >>> be nice that the name of the street would taken. >>> > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses the >>> street-relation to bring all parts together. >>> >>> Do you have a link to that schema? >>> >> >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap >> (in German) >> >> regards >> >> m >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > >
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
