As a workaround for routing, yes. But I don't like the idea to map for routers :)
If these cases are happening very often we could try to merge the cycleways while import with their main streets Regards, Peter On 09.12.2014 16:10, Marc Gemis wrote: > The cases I'm thinking about are like number 6 > on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Radverkehrsanlagen > So it might be best to keep them as cycleway=track on the main street > in those cases. > > > regards > > m > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Peter <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thanks for the links! > > This is really complex matter when I think more about it. As the > street itself could be too dangerous to pass or with a fence to > avoid (bike/pedestrian) crossing > > Peter > > > > On 09.12.2014 15:51, Marc Gemis wrote: >> BTW, it seems like there is some interest in this topic on the >> German mailing list as well, under the title "cycleway=track bei >> Bordstein Trennung" [1] >> it is more general than what I was asking for. >> >> regards >> >> m >> >> [1] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2014-December/109941.html >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Peter <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Marc, >> >> off-the-list you have posted this example: >> >> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=53.077057%2C8.836741&point=53.076918%2C8.836613&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=Lyrk >> >> > As we add more detail to OSM, people start to draw them >> as separate lines >> >> That is a tough problem. >> >> If there is only a distinct connection from cycleway to >> the main street you should map it as one or more >> connecting streets. If there is a free and accessible >> area between the cycleway and the main street and this >> area can be crossed by bike or (only) foot you should map >> it as such. Although we currently do not support area >> routing, it should not be that hard to add: >> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/82 >> >> >> It seems closely related to landuse=highway, but it is not >> the same. This weekend I'l see a number of Belgian mappers. >> I'll try to discuss it there as well. >> >> >> >> >> > Another problem is that those cycleways have no name, while it >> would be >> nice that the name of the street would taken. >> > The might be solved with the Lübeck scheme that uses >> the street-relation to bring all parts together. >> >> Do you have a link to that schema? >> >> >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbeck/Fahrradstadtplan#Radwege-Mapping_in_OpenStreetMap >> (in German) >> >> regards >> >> m >> >>
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
