Hi
Note that this particular input produces wrong buffers when using the old v.buffer and vlib/buffer.c (no matter what the specified distance is: dist < 5, 5 < dist < 10, dist > 10, it outputs wrong things). Similar issues will arise when using the new buffer.c. As I was thinking how to resolve them, I've come to the conclusion that it might not be possible to use the parallel line generation to make buffers. I'll think over it a little more and then I'll decide (hopefully with your help) whether it is inevitable to separate v.buffer from parallel line generation. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
