Actually, when dist <= 1.61, v.buffer works fine. Waiting for suggestions, Rosen
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Росен Матев <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Note that this particular input produces wrong buffers when using the > old v.buffer and vlib/buffer.c (no matter what the specified distance > is: dist < 5, 5 < dist < 10, dist > 10, it outputs wrong things). > Similar issues will arise when using the new buffer.c. As I was > thinking how to resolve them, I've come to the conclusion that it > might not be possible to use the parallel line generation to make > buffers. I'll think over it a little more and then I'll decide > (hopefully with your help) whether it is inevitable to separate > v.buffer from parallel line generation. >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
