Hello, Росен! I think, it's OK for You to do only buffering related stuff and leave parallel line generation for future. Still I think, correct solution for buffers is C (see attached example).
Good luck, Maris. 2008/6/18, Росен Матев <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I propose that I cancel development of "clean_parallel()" (the > function which removes loops), cause its proper behavior is not > determined now (and it might not be possible to determine it). > Instead, I'll start making function which generates "type B" lines, > which will be more useful in buffer generation. What do you think > about it? > > Rosen > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
<<attachment: v.parallel_solution_c.png>>
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
