Hi, 2010/10/14 Michael Barton <[email protected]>: > I agree with Martin and the rest. Backporting is a good idea. It will make > for a better final GRASS 6 (i.e., whatever 6.5 becomes) and it will be > minimal disruption to users since we already made the wxPython GUI the > default at the last minute for 6.4.0.
wxGUI updated in r43911, please test wxGUI in relbr64 if possible. That's very important to make wxGUI stable for 6.4.1. There some open issues, ctypes are not included in relbr64 at this point, so wxnviz is not working. Generally speaking ctypes could be backported from devbr6 to relbr64 without significant problems. The problem is that ctypes are not working on Windows in 6.5 (versioned x unversioned grass libs). I would like to reopen discussion about backporting the building system from 7.0 to 6.5 (and later to 6.4.1). This could help to solve many open issue - one of them is to make ctypes working on Windows. Glynn pointed out some days ago that it's quite complicated to include besides python scripting support also bash scripts in trunk. I think that it's very important to include also bash support in building system in GRASS 7. It would also make possible backporting the building system from trunk to devbr6 and relbr64. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
