Martin Landa wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/10/14 Michael Barton <[email protected]>: >> I agree with Martin and the rest. Backporting is a good idea. It will make >> for a better final GRASS 6 (i.e., whatever 6.5 becomes) and it will be >> minimal disruption to users since we already made the wxPython GUI the >> default at the last minute for 6.4.0. > > wxGUI updated in r43911, please test wxGUI in relbr64 if possible. > That's very important to make wxGUI stable for 6.4.1. There some open > issues, ctypes are not included in relbr64 at this point, so wxnviz is > not working. Generally speaking ctypes could be backported from devbr6 > to relbr64 without significant problems. The problem is that ctypes > are not working on Windows in 6.5 (versioned x unversioned grass > libs).
FWIW, ctypes does not work for me in 6.5 on Linux 64bit. Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
