So, is there any objection to change it back to bilinear/bicubic? If not I will change it and correct the manuals as well (revert r57279).
Does anyone know if linear/cubic is used somewhere used correctly, I mean in the 1-dimensional sense? I couldn't find anything like this. What about renaming G_OPT_R_INTERP_TYPE to G_OPT_R_INTERP_TYPE_2D just in case we would ever need to define separate options for 1 or 3 dimension interpolation? Thanks, Anna On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hamish wrote: > > > Is the "bicubic" truly considering x and y separately? i.e. is it > > actually correct to use the "bi-" prefix with it? > > Yes. > > -- > Glynn Clements <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
