So, is there any objection to change it back to bilinear/bicubic? If not I
will change it and correct the manuals as well (revert r57279).

Does anyone know if linear/cubic is used somewhere used correctly, I mean
in the 1-dimensional sense? I couldn't find anything like this.
What about renaming G_OPT_R_INTERP_TYPE to G_OPT_R_INTERP_TYPE_2D just in
case we would ever need to define separate options for 1 or 3 dimension
interpolation?

Thanks,
Anna


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Hamish wrote:
>
> > Is the "bicubic" truly considering x and y separately? i.e. is it
> > actually correct to use the "bi-" prefix with it?
>
> Yes.
>
> --
> Glynn Clements <[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to