Anna Petrášová wrote: > So, is there any objection to change it back to bilinear/bicubic?
It was originally bilinear/cubic. The inconsistency was the reason for the original change. I don't think that (univariate) cubic interpolation is used anywhere. -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
