On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/06/14 00:15, Markus Neteler wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> 2014-06-10 23:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> Personally I believe that getting-things-done is the better approach >>>>> for 6.4.4 RC1. >>>> >>>> >>>> Let's tag RC1, otherwise we stay on the same place for other >>>> days/weeks/months. >>> >>> >>> I think we can go ahead... Martin >> >> >> I'll wait for Moritz' ok since he objected to let me tag it. > > > I don't know where you got that idea from.
I got that from email from you: ------- On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31/05/14 23:19, Markus Neteler wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Moritz Lennert ... >>> - RC1 beginning of next week >> >> Should that happen then? > > I think (also in line with the above) a clear freeze announcement has to go > out first to give a 24-48h warning to everyone. Then RC1 can be tagged. > > Sorry, but I won't be of much help these days as we've started exams here > and I'll be busy with that almost all week. ------- ... it exceeded as I explained to you my available time window. Perhaps some people underestimate the amount of work to prepare a release, even a RC. So I just remind you that a bit more than just launching the "svn tag" is involved. And the number of broken releases in the past is close to zero. > I proposed a more structured process of doing it, that's all. ... which is generally fine. > Since this proposal has not met with any > concrete feedback, other than it shouldn't be applied for 6.4, I'll just get > out of the way and let you handle things the way you want to. We have 19 "virtual" full time developers according to ohloh. I cannot speak for the others but I want to get RC1 done since it is *only* a release candidate and nothing else. Then we can consider to even apply a new procedure. Just please let us do this RC1 - the planning accouncement is from mid of Nov 2013, so probably enough time ago. Surely I can retired from GRASS 6 maintenance if that opens up things. But let me do RC1 first :-) > Let me just add (gratuitously, I'm aware of that, but I'm a bit tired of a > process where people make clear and concrete suggestions on an issue, but > the content of these suggestions is just ignored, and the people who made > them are then blamed that nothing advances) that if you had applied the > proposed procedure when it was proposed [1], we would be really close to RC2 > by now... Yes, if more feedback would come I would be happy as well. Markus > Moritz > > [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2014-May/069126.html _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
