On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/06/14 21:43, Markus Neteler wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> ... >>> >>> As I've already told Markus off-list, I think that in order for this to >>> work >>> we would need a clearly defined release-process with clear announcements >>> of >>> the different steps (pre-freeze warning sufficiently early, freeze >>> announcement, pre-tag announcement, etc) and a strict respect of the >>> rules >>> during this process (i.e. no non bugfix commits during a freeze), etc. >> >> >> It doesn't seem to happen.
[I referred to the lack of responses in a sarcastic way :-) ] > At this stage there have never been clear announcements, easily identifiable > as such for all developers. We should not assume that every developer reads > every thread. Thus, such announcements should be outside of existing > threads, and clearly marked in the subject. Sure. But I may mention that I do these releases since end of 1997 and any attempt in the past to implement a *respected* release schedule failed! See the archive for older attempts. >> Please note ... the OSGeoLive feature freeze for the FOSS4G Portland >> conf is upcoming. Would be a pity to not even see 6.4.4 therein! > > I'm a bit more available in the next weeks, so I can help with this process. > Just let me know. Unless we don't start tagging one day it will never reach the OSGeoLive DVD. Their freeze is the 6 July 2014 according to Cameron's email. And indeed we need to have GRASS 7 in it for our upcoming workshop but that's offtopic for this email thread. Markus (who feels a bit blocked by some developers) _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
