On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I find that 6 months is a fairly long period to maintain a bugfix-only >> branch. I would rather propose to either branch later, or to allow more >> than just bugfixes into the release branch for 4-5 months before going into >> bugfix-only phase for the last month or two. During the first period new >> features can be ported to the release branch once they have had some >> testing in trunk. >> >> > Moritz, I believe that these are two different things. > > ... > > Second, committing features to both branches is what is taking the time > from us and creating uncertainty about what is where and what are the > branches for. I think that this is crucial point and the lengths of time > periods above should be decided based on this, not the other way around. > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Yann Chemin <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like we all want to see version numbers move on a yearly basis > with periods of branching and periods of releasing... We need to agree on the policy of committing to release branch(es). See my proposal [1] for details. [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/2014-March/001150.html
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
