On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > We put the proposal to Trac wiki (1), so we can track changes into it. In > > future it can go to (Doxygen) documentation but not now. > > I would say that this proposal should be defined as RFC4 [1]. Are you > willing to work on it? > > I'm. Not right now, but in next weeks yes. I'm not sure what means work on it. I have to look at the other RFC what would be the appropriate format etc. Then I have to go through comments here but I guess more comments are needed but perhaps after I draft it first. > BTW, I think that better place for RFC's would be Trac wiki rather > than API manual (it's duplicated for G6 and G7). What do you think? > The duplication is certainly dangerous here. Trac seems like a proper place (although this does not completely fit to the Trac wiki rules I proposed because it does not fit anywhere). Vaclav
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc