On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote:
> My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. How to 
> define them is a
> more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the long email 
> chain in the PCS IIRC.

Indeed....
Additionally, it is *very* complicated to define who is a community member.

Two options yet to consider:

- the ChangeLog contains some references to code contributors without
SVN core access, e.g.

# incomplete "grep":
zgrep -i contributed ChangeLog.gz
      manual: example update (contributed by Vero Andreo)
      (contributed by Paul Kelly, trunk r68308)
      example added (contributed by Vero Andreo) (trunk, r68187)
      (trunk, r67581; contributed by Vero Andreo)
      r67571, r67572 (contributed by Vero Andreo)
      v.krige: updated to rgrass7 - sync to trunk (contributed by
      manual: more examples (contributed by Veronica Andreo)
      of NC example added (contributed by Carol X Garzon-Lopez)
      semi-synthetic NC example added (contributed by Carol X
      example added (contributed by Vero Andreo); msg enhancement
      manual: example expanded (contributed by Vero Andreo)
      (contributed by Aldo Clerici)
      vector/v.to.3d/trans3.c: fix compiler warnings (contributed by
    * r.mapcalc/r3.mapcalc: graph2() function added (contributed by
    * v.split/segment/parallel manuals: improvements (contributed by
    * v.split manual: new NC examples (contributed by Milena
    * area_poly1.c function documentation improved (contributed by
      contributed by Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail com>
    * help page contributed by Trevor Wiens <twiens interbaun com>
    * help page contributed by Trevor Wiens <twiens interbaun com>
    * EPS output added (contributed by Bruno Caprile, ITC-irst)

In fact, all should have been added here:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors.csv
but that file didn't get updated lately.

Suggestion: updated this file from the ChangeLog and add to the list
of eligible voters. The next PSC may improve the process then.

my 0.02 cents,
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Reply via email to