* Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> [2016-09-19 11:12:09 +0200]:
On 18/09/16 20:50, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]>
wrote:
2016-09-18 18:51 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <[email protected]>:
It was on the recent community sprint agenda, with no real outcome.
We do need a git *expert* for this. Anyone?
However, I believe that this topic is more a technical rather than a
political one which belongs to grass-dev.
I am willing to help with this issue. Probably others will be
interested too, Vaclav? Ma
Yes, to certain extent. However, I think it is not purely technical and it
is coupled with OSGeo and other OSGeo projects.
Right- But the PSC is only involved once the technical aspects are clear.
One of the questions I would think we should think about from the
beginning is whether we really want to run with a double system (svn and
git) or whether it might be easier in the long run, to completely switch
over to git...
From my point of view, git is easier. I have experiences now, like many
in the GRASS community, controlling almost everything ascii using git
(not only code). My experiences in resolving conflicts, though, when it
comes to merge branches, are, indeed, limited. I did a few stuff, but
not enough.
But we should just go for it, in the beginning, at least, experimental
and playing around in a sandbox-like repository.
Cheers, Nikos
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
