On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
PSC, all,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 22. Dezember 2020 09:24:17 MEZ schrieb "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election
2020" <[email protected]>:
On 2020-12-21 22:20, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
wouldn't it be more transparent if current GRASS GIS PSC members are
nominated for re-election in the same way by the community as possible new
candidates?
Thanks for your input, Helmut. The election wiki is not very clear about
this, it only states that "current PSC members will be asked if they
wish to stand as a candidate for the upcoming election" without any
further clarification. This is definitely a grey area worth developing.
I agree your proposal is a good idea, but it is possibly not my role to
decide on this. Also it is possibly late as we we have already launched
the nominations.
I believe this is something the PSC can decide:
1. should current PSC members have the right to stand up for reelection
without explicit nomination? (current line of action)
or
2. should current PSC members have to be nominated in the same way as
any other member of the community? (we could start right now as no PSC
members have yet stand up)
I agree with Helmut and would plead for 2).
I also agree with Helmut and would plead for 2).
But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earlier.
Still it is not too late, say, "nothing lost".
Marcus, what do you say on this? What do other PSC members say? Shall
the PSC make a consensus on these proposals? In that case it would be
nice to have the matter resolved rather sooner than later.
Hernán (CRO)
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
