On 2020-12-22 17:43, Michael Barton wrote:
I have no issue with either proposal. I did not respond because I
never saw a notification, even though I was looking for it.
If I counted correctly, it seems then that at this point we will need
one more PSC vote to approve proposal #2.
"GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same
way by the community as possible new candidates"
Anyone?
Hernán (CRO)
On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:48 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
GIS election 2020 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
...
But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earlier.
Still it is not too late, say, "nothing lost".
Marcus, what do you say on this?
What I tried to say is that we might quickly modify our procedure to
Helli's suggestion as no PSC member had answered yet (hence, no
conflict arises so far).
What do other PSC members say? Shall
the PSC make a consensus on these proposals? In that case it would be
nice to have the matter resolved rather sooner than later.
Definitely.
@PSC: do you agree to change our procedure to
"GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same
way by the community as possible new candidates"
?
Markus
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!LXnc6cuCYMYT1IyIMAPQJ9fyf7msoxybE0_ekbTQIbJHMx8vCcfIl-5hyOavwxwa7AcwZNw$
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
