Daniel Victoria wrote: > > It's not r.mapcalc fault. I imagine it's probably a limitation due to > the number of bits in your image. For instance, 8 bit images can have > up to 256 values. 16 bit images can have 65,535. So, if you have too > many values, you will have problems. Not sure how to avoid this in > your case but, maybe you will need to work with categories after all. > Are you planing on doing any math operations in the concatenated > values or is it more for displaying pourposes? > Hi Daniel...
Maybe it would be useful only concatenation but I would also have the possibility to apply tools such as r.statistics and other similar that work on the value of cells. Gabriele -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Values-from-multiple-raster-to-link-together-tp5741032p5768618.html Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
