Thank you Moritz, > - I'm not sure I like the difference in size of cat values between > layers. It gives the idea that there is one important and two secondary > layers.
Sorry, I don't understand. Cats values are all the same font size in the drawing (I turned "1" values to sth else, perhaps an optical illusion) > > - Your attribute table examples all show the classical GRASS usage of > category values as indicators of type (type of path, type of plot). > Maybe, just to make that point clear, you could use a table with > individual cat values for each feature and a second column with type. You mean showing that "cat" is nothing but a key column, not necessarily refering to whatever values in an /exotic/ source of data ? + I changed column name "cat" to "type" for layer 2 I added a category to feature #13 that table does not hold. http://www.toraval.fr/telec/catsnlayers_3.zip _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user