This is a failure of Mozilla to reach out enough to the dev community to ensure that the most popular add-ons are ready for firefox 4b1.
@P JH, it looks like XMarks released a preliminary version that works with FF4B1 the same day you made your post July 16. They at least have clearer communication as to their process and desire to make their users happy. Greasemonkey appears to be a black hole in terms of its planning. On Jul 16, 10:09 am, P JH <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:22 AM, flubba <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should be pretty trivial to implement. > > How rude. Let me guess - you're not directly involved with producing software? > > If it's /that/ trivial, then why not do it yourself? > > Or to perhaps, to put it into context, from another add-on > supplier:http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/topics/firefox_4_0_support > > # Mozilla is changing everything all around forFirefox4 > # (as is common with major version updates), so it'll take > # a while for the bookmark interface to settle down, and > # then for us to update Xmarks to match the new interface. > # > # We're aware of the necessary changes, though, and are > # working on it. > > -- > PJH > > http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/makeitthemaximum -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
