*The Judiciary: Cutting Edge
Of A Predator State*

*By Prashant Bhushan*

07 December, 2006
*Countercurrents.org*

*A*t a time when the dominant class in India is obsessed with power and when
India appears to be at the threshold of becoming an "economic and military
superpower", it is interesting that Tehelka has organized this seminar
called, "The summit of the powerless". Though one hardly sees any powerless
people here, or even many who represent them, it is still important that a
meeting on this theme has been organized by Tehelka.

It is this obsession with power which is the driving force behind the vision
of India of the ruling elite of this country. That is why we see the
frequent "power summits" being organized by major media organizations which
are dominated by talk of India as an "emerging superpower", with a booming
sensex and a GDP growth poised to reach 8, 9 and even 10%. And it is this
power crazed libido of the elite which have made them the cheerleaders of
the government which is straining to become the Asian right hand of the
United States. This single minded pursuit of a strategic relationship with
the US has made us lose our moral bearings as we vote against our old
friends like Iran and keep quiet on unimaginable atrocities being committed
by the US in Iraq and by Israel in Palestine.

What kind of society is this "power driven" vision of India producing. While
the elite celebrate the booming sensex, the consumer boom among the middle
classes which the spectacular GDP growth appear to be giving them, the poor
are pushed to greater and greater destitution, as the agricultural economy
collapses and they are sought to be deprived of whatever little they have in
terms of land and other natural resources. After all, when agriculture is
not contributing to the GDP growth, why not take away the land, water and
other resources from agriculture and give them to the sectors which are
leading the growth-the SEZs and the IT industry for example. That (and the
opportunity for a real estate killing) explains the stampede for setting up
SEZs and IT parks, which will be high growth privileged enclaves, helped no
doubt by the cheap compulsory acquisition of land, the absence of taxes,
labour and environmental laws. They are envisioned almost as private and
self governing States with their own police and courts. It makes no
difference to those who hope to occupy these enclaves that India is almost
at the bottom of the heap in terms of the Human Development Index, in terms
of the percentage of people in the country who have access to housing, food,
water, sanitation, education and healthcare.

So as the rural economy is destroyed (partly by agricultural imports) and
the poor are deprived of their land, their forests, their water and indeed
all their resources, to make way for mining leases, dams, SEZs and IT parks,
all of which augur faster GDP growth, the poor get pushed to suicide or to
urban slums. Here they struggle for existence in subhuman conditions with no
sanitation, water, electricity, and always at the mercy of the weather,
corrupt policemen and municipal officials. These slums often exist side by
side with luxurious enclaves of the ultra rich who pass by them with barely
a scornful glance and regard them as a nuisance who should be put away
beyond their gaze. And if the government cannot accomplish that, there are
always the courts to lend a helping hand. In the past two years about 2 lakh
slum dwellers from the Yamuna Pushta and other Jhuggi colonies of Delhi have
been removed on the orders of the court and thrown to the streets or dumped
in the boondocks of Bawana (40 Kms from Delhi) and without any sanitation,
water, electricity or even drainage. It would be surprising if many of them
do not become criminals or join the ranks of naxalites who have come to
control greater and greater parts of the country.

What kind of society are we creating? A society which is not only deeply
divided in economic classes with a vast chasm dividing them, but also one
where the preoccupations of the dominant classes are becoming increasingly
crassly materialistic, narcissistic and base. If one were to examine the
content of the mainstream electronic media-even news channels, particularly
private channels which are the main source of information and entertainment
for the middle class elite, one would find that it is characterized by an
increasingly vacuous intellectual content and pandering more and more to the
baser instincts of sex, violence and a morbid fascination for gossip
particularly about the private lives of Bollywood stars. Stories about real
people and serious public interest issues have been reduced to mere sound
bytes of a few seconds. The interest of the middle classes in and their
attention span for serious issues of public interest have been reduced to a
vanishing point, as the culture of consumerism and self indulgence has taken
over contemporary society. Even as scientific evidence piles up about how
the world is headed towards environmental catastrophe due to global warming,
not many among our well to do elite have even bothered to understand the
issue, let alone bother about tackling the problem. They are oblivious of
and unconcerned about the disaster which will certainly affect their
children if not themselves during their lifetimes.

A sickness afflicts the soul of the dominant elite of India today. It is a
sickness which has led to a total loss of vision and has made us lose our
moral bearings. It is this sickness which is allowing us to celebrate our
great GDP growth and our emerging superpower status when the majority of our
countrymen sink to deeper and deeper depths of destitution and despair. It
is this sickness which allows us to rejoice in our becoming the main
sidekick of the global bully, while we shut our eyes to the enormous
injustice being done to the oppressed people of Iraq, Palestine and other
countries at the receiving end of the bully's muscle. It is this sickness
which has produced the vision of the State as the facilitator of this
rapaciously exploitative model of development. A vision where the State's
role is seen as an institution which tries to facilitate the maximization of
GDP growth. Which naturally requires the State to withdraw from its welfare
obligations and facilitate a privatized society run on laissez faire
economics. After all, private enterprise, run on the profit motive is the
best bet for maximizing GDP growth. It is this model which snatches land
from the farmer for the SEZs, the IT parks and the mines. That vision is
producing a society which is intoxicated with a kind of development and
feeling of "power" which are sowing the seeds of its own destruction in not
too far a future. We have become a society of many Neros who are fiddling
while the country is on fire.

It is not surprising then that the "powerless" regard the State as predator
rather than protector. Even more unfortunately, the recent role of the
judiciary which was mandated by the constitution to protect the rights of
the people is making it appear as if it has become the cutting edge of a
predator State.


There was a time, not so long ago, when the Supreme Court of India waxed
eloquent about the Fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed by
Article 21 of the Constitution to include all that it takes to lead a decent
and dignified life. They thus held that the right to life includes the right
to Food, the right to employment and the right to shelter: in other words,
the right to all the basic necessities of life. That was in the roaring 80's
when a new tool of public interest litigation was fashioned where anyone
could invoke the jurisdiction of the Courts even by writing a post card on
behalf of the poor and disadvantaged who were too weak to approach the
courts themselves. It seemed that a new era was dawning and that the courts
were emerging as a new liberal instrument within the State which the poor
could access to get some respite from the various excesses and assaults of
the executive.

Alas, all that seems a distant dream now, given the recent role of the
courts in not just failing to protect the rights of the poor that they had
themselves declared not long ago, but in fact spearheading the massive
assault on the poor since the era of economic liberalization. This is
happening in case after case, whether they are of the tribal oustees of the
Narmada Dam, or the urban slum dwellers whose homes are being ruthlessly
bulldozed without notice and without rehabilitation, on the orders of the
court, or the urban hawkers and rickshaw pullers of Delhi and Mumbai who
have been ordered to be removed from the streets again on the orders of the
court. Public interest litigation has been turned on its head. Instead of
being used to protect the rights of the poor, it is now being used by
commercial interests and the upper middle classes to launch a massive
assault in the poor in the drive to take over urban spaces and even rural
land occupied by the poor, for commercial development. While the lands of
the rural poor are being compulsorily taken over for commercial real estate
development for the wealthy, the urban poor are being evicted from the
public land that they have been occupying for decades for commercial
development by big builders, for shopping malls and housing for the wealthy.
Roadside hawkers are being evicted on the orders of the Courts (which will
ensure that people will shop only in these shopping malls). All this is
being done, not only in violation of the rights of the poor declared by the
Courts, but also in violation of the policies for slum dwellers and hawkers
which have been formulated by the governments. Usually these actions of the
Court seem to have the tacit and covert approval of the government (and the
court is used to do what a democratically accountable government cannot do).
Let us examine a few of these cases.

In the Narmada case, the Court recently refused to restrain further
construction of the Dam which would submerge thousands of families without
rehabilitation even when it was clear that this was not only in violation of
the Narmada Tribunal Award, but against their declared fundamental rights.
The court's behaviour in first refusing to hear the matter, then repeatedly
adjourning it, then allowing the construction to be completed on the
specious ground that they needed the report of the Shunglu Committee,
clearly demonstrated a total lack of sensitivity to the oustees and a total
subordination of their rights to the commercial interests of those
industrialists led by Narendra Modi who are eyeing the Narmada waters for
their industries, water parks and golf courses. The gap between the rhetoric
and the actions of the Court could not be more yawning.

Meanwhile, as the Narmada oustees were being submerged without
rehabilitation, a massive programme of urban displacement of slum dwellers
without rehabilitation was being carried out in Delhi and Bombay, also on
the orders of the High Courts. Sometimes on the applications of upper middle
class colonies, sometimes on their own, the Courts have been issuing a spate
of orders for clearing slums by bulldozing the jhuggis on them, on the
ground that they are on public land. Some of this is being done with the
tacit approval of the government, such as the slums on the banks of the
Yamuna which are being cleared for making way for the constructions for the
Commonwealth games. And all this, without even issuing notices to the slum
dwellers, in violation of the principles of natural justice.

This was not all. The Court's relentless assaults on the poor continued with
the Supreme Court ordering the eviction of Hawkers from the streets of
Bombay and Delhi. Again, turning their backs on Constitution bench
judgements of the Court that Hawkers have a fundamental right to hawk on the
streets, which could however be regulated, the Court now observed that
streets exist primarily for traffic. They thus ordered the Municipality and
the police to remove the "unlicenced hawkers" from the streets of Delhi. All
this again without any notice or hearing to the hawkers. This effectively
meant that almost all the more than 1.5 lakh hawkers would be placed at the
mercy of the authorities, since less than 3 percent had been given licences.

More recently, the Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of rickshaws
from the Chandni Chowk area, ostensively to pave the way for CNG buses. This
order will not only deprive tens of thousands of rickshaw pullers of a
harmless and environmentally friendly source of livelihood, it will also
cause enormous inconvenience to tens of thousands of commuters who use that
mode of transport.

Several recent judgements of the court have grossly diluted the various
labour laws which were enacted to protect the rights of workers. The
government has been wanting to dilute these laws for bringing about what
they call "labour reforms", in line with the new economic policies, but they
have been unable to do so because of political opposition. The courts have
thus stepped in to do what the government cannot do politically. They have
not only diluted the protection afforded to workmen by various laws but have
openly stated that the Court's interpretation of the Laws must be in line
with the government's new economic policy- a fantastic proposition which
means that the executive government can override parliamentary legislation
by executive policy. The same proposition was enunciated by the Supreme
Court in the Mauritius double taxation case, where the court said that the
government can by executive notification give a tax holiday to Mauritius
based companies, even though it is well settled that tax exemptions can only
be given by the Finance Act which has to be passed by Parliament. Thus we
find that the Courts are becoming a convenient instrument for the government
to bypass Parliament and implement executive policy which is in violation of
even Parliamentary legislation. This congruence of interest between the
executive and the courts is most common when it comes to policies which are
designed to benefit the wealthy elite.

One important reason why the court can do such things is because it is
completely unaccountable. The executive government must seek reelection
every 5 years which acts as a restraint on its anti poor policies. The court
has no such restraint. There is no disciplinary authority over judges, with
the system of impeachment having been found to be completely impractical. On
top of this, the Supreme Court has by a self serving judgement removed
judges from accountability from even criminal acts by declaring that no
criminal investigation can be conducted against judges without the prior
approval of the Chief Justice of India. This has resulted in a situation
where no criminal investigation has been conducted against any judge in the
last 15 years since this judgement despite common knowledge of widespread
corruption in the judiciary. Even serious public criticism and scrutiny of
the judiciary has been effectively barred by the threat of contempt of
Court. And now, they have effectively declared themselves as exempt from
even the right to information Act. Is it surprising then that they suffer
from judicial arrogance which enables them to deliver such judgements.

This has bred and is continuing to breed enormous resentment among the poor
and the destitute. Feeling helpless and abandoned, nay violated by every
organ of the State, particularly the judiciary, many are committing
suicides, but some are taking to violence. That explains the growing cadres
of the Maoists who now control many districts and even States like
Chhatisgarh. The government and the ruling establishment thinks that they
can deal with this menace by stongarm military methods. That explains why
the government relies more and more on the advice of former cops like Gill
and Narayanan and why there is talk of using the Army and Air Force against
the Maoists. Tribals in Chhattisgarh are being forced to join a mercenary
army funded by the State by the name of Salva Judum to fight the Maoists.
But all this will breed more Maoists. No insurrection bred out of
desperation can be quelled by strongarm tactics. The very tactics breed more
misery and desperation and will push more people to the Maoists.

Unless urgent steps are taken to correct the course that the elite
establishment of this country is embarked upon, we will soon have an
insurgency on our hands which will be impossible to control. Then, when the
history of the country's descent towards violence and chaos is written, the
judiciary of the country can claim pride of place among those who speeded up
this process.
We desperately and urgently need a new vision for the country as well as for
the judiciary. We need to rediscover and perhaps reinvent the concept of the
State as a welfare State. Our judiciary was created by the British who
created it mainly to protect the interests of the empire. That is one of the
reasons why it in inaccessible to the common people. We need to reinvent the
judiciary in line with a new vision for India. A judiciary which will really
be people friendly, which can be accessed without the mediation of
professional lawyers and which will consider it its mission to protect the
rights of the poor. Unless we can demonstrate the capacity to form that
vision and translate in into action, we are headed for serious trouble.


*Prashant Bhushan* is a senior lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. This is
the full text of a speech delivered at Tehelka's summit of the powerless.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Ours is a battle not for wealth or for power.
It is a battle for freedom. It is a battle for the reclamation of human
personality."
- Dr BR Ambedkar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala run by
Global Alternate Information Applications (GAIA)
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to