@ Anivar I think anivar that moderation should not be there at least in this discussion Let Ranjit say what he has to say with facts. That would be more healthy... We will then discuss about people and issues based on facts.
@ Sanil Is "so the sugatakumari mafia will also hijjack Athirappilly??????!!!!!!!!!!! "Abhayam" tharooooooooo.....arku?" a criticism of Sugathakumaris public action? Where is this public action in these lines? @ ranjit What do you mean that why should she live at 'people's cost? Who is this 'people' U tell me how far have you been engaged in this current struggle of the Athirappally project? Ranjit I am no spokes person of Sugathakumari neither know her personally nor want to. I have not read any of her works...................... but still I do not understand your problem is it and I am glad you can accept Modi in the place of Sugatha kumari wonderful logic any way.......... On Sep 24, 9:05 pm, sanil v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our moderator has struck again. Renjit has been an > active and responsible participant in the discussions > . That his view could be unsubstantiated is no > argument for moderation. Many views expressed in this > forum - but, perhaps agreeable to the moderators - are > unsubstantiated. > > Renjit has criticised a public figure in the context > of her public action. He has not commented on her > private life. How can it be construed as talking about > "people"? > > Hope the moderator will not come up with a semantic > distinction between moderation and censorship. That > would be the sure sign of an immoderate censor. > > sanil > > --- Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Renjit, The amount of hate in your mail does not > > benefit the struggle in > > athirappilly. > > You have to prove your assumptions before dumping > > hate on her > > > Ranjit Ranjit wrote: > > > to anil > > > > why should we let them (sugata kinda people) live > > at people's cost? > > > Do you have any proof of it? > > > > who is afraid of Sugatakumari> > > > That is offtopic for this list > > > > why mallu media protectng her ? > > > At first You have to prove mallu media is protecting > > her . If it is so > > it may be a good topic for research. > > > why mallu green activists blind to her tricks? > > > You have to prove > > 1. she have tricks > > 2. Mallu activists are blinds ( Happy to know that > > you are not in that > > list ) > > 3 Why question only comes after that > > > Temporarily You are under moderation now. The > > discussions must be on > > issues, not people > > > Anivar > > ___________________________________________________________________________-_________ > Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search > that gives answers, not web > links.http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC- Hide quoted > text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
