Moralism always creats situations like this.
To substantiate allegations is a moral responsibility , be it in any forum.
Pointing out that it has been done earlier in this forum won't suffice.
Anivar,
As you were actively involved in the
debate this time, I find the proclamation [that Ranjith will be under
moderation ]
as undemocratic.
I would advise to neglect such extream moralists
[ a lesson I learned at big expense!!!]..
See, for instance, Ranjith made similar comments against Ajitha, and
remained silent when her name appeared among the signatories in Chithralekha
issue!!
On 9/25/07, Ranjit Ranjit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> i never said she cant participate.. i ve no problem even if u invite
> MOdi..
> but i protest ...
> hijack, people's cost, mafia, fraud etc etc are not hatred devices rather
> it point towards the inherent methodologies adopted for the
> institutionalisation of "environmentalism" in kerala. the fanfare for
> celebrted Sacred cows are only a symptom...
> need to read newspaers only (no need to attend SFI camps for that)
> i can even talk in the HATRED LANGUAGE OF ANIVAR.... i d not wanna ("avar
> jeevichotte" ennalle anilavakyam!!)
>
> the kind of immaturity and blind faith shown by some towards sugata for me
> is IRRESPONSIBLE
> IT is nothing other than cheating people in the name of struggle (i hope
> people of athirappilly are smart enough to realise this).... no need for
> investigation to identify such trends in green movements..just opne ur eyes
> and see.............
>
> Ref:
> 1) Kiliroor sex racket case
> 2) mental harrassment of the inmates of abhaya
> 3) vanitha commission
> 4) M F husain issue
> 5) cultural kerala's casteist literature
> 6) environmentlsm as savarna Hindu ploy
> 7) status quoist feminism
> 8) Narendra modi and gujrat's developemnt
> etc etc etc
>
> On 25/09/2007, prasanth kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ranjit using words like -hijacking, playing tricks, living at people's
> > > cost, sugathakumari mafia, fraud- sounds quite strange and seething
> > > personal hatred. and saying that 'i am not here to teach anything' is
> > > highly
> > > irresponsible(in mildest language. you can use the language of Swaraj(
> > > SFI)
> > > as well). u can attack a person and be critical. but you must substantiate
> > > it. unless that happens it should only be considered as mud slinging with
> > > sinister motives. nothing more.
> > >
> > > otherwise what is wrong with sugathakumari participating in this
> > > struggle. ranjit can also be part of it and try his best to prevent her
> > > from
> > > hijacking it.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >
--
Dileep R I thuravoor
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
