Dear all... Green youth is becoming yet another platform to Make fun of each other.??????? Please stop it!
regrds Shanoj On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]>wrote: > Let me refer to collected works of Kuttichathan and find a way out for > myself :-))) > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Anil M <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Damodar, u estimate or not but u have to help him find out which is >> true...* Everything is possible or Nothing is impossible.* (The Mumabi- >> Pune route is tricky. In Bheja Fry, Vinay Pathak. travels in a bus in the >> same route :))....Even Delhi philosophers couldn’t help him, since he is a >> non believer, god also can't help him. >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, damodar prasad >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> aayo..Funny Games changed my perception of the world. Hence, NO >>> ESTIMATION. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> if u want fun, help me clarifying one of my long standing doubt . >>>> i was travelling in a bus from mumbai to pune . inside the bus , it is >>>> written in a poster >>>> like this " *Everything is possible*" . >>>> >>>> but even after reading that poster repeatedly , i could not convince >>>> myself that everything is possible . everytime i say "everything is >>>> possible >>>> ", the impossibility of something haunted me . >>>> after reaching pune , i asked my friends . some people including me felt >>>> that it is better to say " *nothing is impossible* " but some were of >>>> the opinion that " everything is possible " gives more confidence . >>>> we even discussed this with a professor of philosophy in delhi >>>> university but nobody could reach an agreement . >>>> this may see very silly to u but i am still confused . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On *Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <[email protected]>* wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: damodar prasad <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong? >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:45 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> sorry, over-estimate! >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, damodar prasad < >>>> [email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't want to underestimate you, sreenivas. Have fun! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, sreenivas v.p < >>>>> [email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Damodar , >>>>>> >>>>>> I wrote that as an introduction , I think three theories changed our >>>>>> perception about ourselves and the universe . >>>>>> 1. Theory of relativity >>>>>> 2. Marxism >>>>>> 3. darwin's theory of evolution . >>>>>> the world before these men of genius has no singificance . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On *Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad >>>>>> <[email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>>> >* wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: damodar prasad >>>>>> <[email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong? >>>>>> To: >>>>>> [email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>>> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:16 PM >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Srinivas, >>>>>> >>>>>> *like Marxism , another theory that changed our perception about the >>>>>> world was Einstein's theory of relativity . >>>>>> >>>>>> did you write the above sentence? or the sydney team.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> * On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, sreenivas v.p < >>>>>> [email protected]<http://in.mc87.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> * It outhrown the newtonian conception of the world and lead >>>>>>> to revolutionary discoveries in the study of the universe . But was >>>>>>> Einstein wrong ? * >>>>>>> *See the below report . * >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SYDNEY -- A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed >>>>>>> of light may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat >>>>>>> one >>>>>>> of the most cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein's theory of >>>>>>> relativity. >>>>>>> The team, led by theoretical physicist Paul Davies of Sydney's >>>>>>> Macquarie University, say it is possible that the speed of light has >>>>>>> slowed >>>>>>> over billions of years. >>>>>>> If so, physicists will have to rethink many of their basic ideas >>>>>>> about the laws of the universe. >>>>>>> "That means giving up the theory of relativity and E-mc squared and >>>>>>> all that sort of stuff," Davies told Reuters. >>>>>>> "But of course it doesn't mean we just throw the books in the bin, >>>>>>> because it's in the nature of scientific revolution that the old >>>>>>> theories >>>>>>> become incorporated in the new ones." >>>>>>> Davies, and astrophysicists Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from >>>>>>> the University of New South Wales published the proposal in the August 8 >>>>>>> edition of scientific journal *Nature.* (it also appeared in latest >>>>>>> "Scientific american " magazine ). >>>>>>> The suggestion that the speed of light can change is based on data >>>>>>> collected by UNSW astronomer John Webb, who posed a conundrum when he >>>>>>> found >>>>>>> that light from a distant quasar, a star-like object, had absorbed the >>>>>>> wrong >>>>>>> type of photons from interstellar clouds on its 12 billion year journey >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> earth. >>>>>>> Davies said fundamentally Webb's observations meant that the >>>>>>> structure of atoms emitting quasar light was slightly but ever so >>>>>>> significantly different to the structure of atoms in humans. >>>>>>> The discrepancy could only be explained if either the electron >>>>>>> charge, or the speed of light, had changed. >>>>>>> "But two of the cherished laws of the universe are the law that >>>>>>> electron charge shall not change and that the speed of light shall not >>>>>>> change, so whichever way you look at it we're in trouble," Davies said. >>>>>>> To establish which of the two constants might not be that constant >>>>>>> after all, Davies' team resorted to the study of black holes, mysterious >>>>>>> astronomical bodies that suck in stars and other galactic features. >>>>>>> They also applied another dogma of physics, the second law of >>>>>>> thermodynamics, which Davies summarizes as "you can't get something for >>>>>>> nothing." >>>>>>> After considering that a change in the electron charge over time >>>>>>> would violate the sacrosanct second law of thermodynamics, they >>>>>>> concluded >>>>>>> that the only option was to challenge the constancy of the speed of >>>>>>> light. >>>>>>> More study of quasar light is needed in order to validate Webb's >>>>>>> observations, and to back up the proposal that light speed may vary, a >>>>>>> theory Davies stresses represents only the first chink in the armor of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> theory of relativity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. >>>> >>>> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_messenger_6/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
