entammo!!!! blocking id .... that would be fun
On Apr 3, 4:28 pm, "sreenivas v.p" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dont worry shanoj.
>
> when he cannot understand the theory of Einstein , what he will do ?
> i request you also to stop sending mails to this "fun " making platform .
>
> and this is my last mail . I am going to block the ID in my machine .
>
> regards
> sreenivas
>
>
> --- On Fri, 3/4/09, shanoj poduval <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: shanoj poduval <[email protected]>
> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, 3 April, 2009, 3:18 PM
>
> Dear all...
>
> Green youth is becoming yet another platform to Make fun of each other.???????
> Please stop it!
>
> regrds
> Shanoj
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Let me refer to collected works of Kuttichathan and find a way out for myself
> :-)))
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Anil M <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Damodar, u estimate or not but u have to help him find out which is true...
> Everything is possible or Nothing is impossible. (The Mumabi- Pune route is
> tricky. In Bheja Fry, Vinay Pathak. travels in a bus in the same route
> :))....Even Delhi philosophers couldn’t help him, since he is a non believer,
> god also can't help him.
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> aayo..Funny Games changed my perception of the world. Hence, NO ESTIMATION.
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> if u want fun, help me clarifying one of my long standing doubt .
> i was travelling in a bus from mumbai to pune . inside the bus , it is
> written in a poster
> like this " Everything is possible" .
>
> but even after reading that poster repeatedly , i could not convince myself
> that everything is possible . everytime i say "everything is possible ", the
> impossibility of something haunted me .
> after reaching pune , i asked my friends . some people including me felt that
> it is better to say " nothing is impossible " but some were of the opinion
> that " everything is possible " gives more confidence .
> we even discussed this with a professor of philosophy in delhi university but
> nobody could reach an agreement .
> this may see very silly to u but i am still confused .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: damodar prasad <[email protected]>
> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:45 PM
>
> sorry, over-estimate!
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I don't want to underestimate you, sreenivas. Have fun!
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Damodar ,
>
> I wrote that as an introduction , I think three theories changed our
> perception about ourselves and the universe .
> 1. Theory of relativity
> 2. Marxism
> 3. darwin's theory of evolution .
> the world before these men of genius has no singificance .
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: damodar prasad <[email protected]>
> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:16 PM
>
> Srinivas,
>
> like Marxism , another theory that changed our perception about the world was
> Einstein's theory of relativity .
>
> did you write the above sentence? or the sydney team..
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> It outhrown the newtonian conception of the world and lead
> to revolutionary discoveries in the study of the universe . But was Einstein
> wrong ?
> See the below report .
>
> SYDNEY -- A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed of
> light may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat one of
> the most cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein's theory of relativity.
> The team, led by theoretical physicist Paul Davies of Sydney's Macquarie
> University, say it is possible that the speed of light has slowed over
> billions of years.
> If so, physicists will have to rethink many of their basic ideas about the
> laws of the universe.
> "That means giving up the theory of relativity and E-mc squared and all that
> sort of stuff," Davies told Reuters.
> "But of course it doesn't mean we just throw the books in the bin, because
> it's in the nature of scientific revolution that the old theories become
> incorporated in the new ones."
> Davies, and astrophysicists Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the
> University of New South Wales published the proposal in the August 8 edition
> of scientific journal Nature. (it also appeared in latest "Scientific
> american " magazine ).
> The suggestion that the speed of light can change is based on data collected
> by UNSW astronomer John Webb, who posed a conundrum when he found that light
> from a distant quasar, a star-like object, had absorbed the wrong type of
> photons from interstellar clouds on its 12 billion year journey to earth.
> Davies said fundamentally Webb's observations meant that the structure of
> atoms emitting quasar light was slightly but ever so significantly different
> to the structure of atoms in humans.
> The discrepancy could only be explained if either the electron charge, or the
> speed of light, had changed.
> "But two of the cherished laws of the universe are the law that electron
> charge shall not change and that the speed of light shall not change, so
> whichever way you look at it we're in trouble," Davies said.
> To establish which of the two constants might not be that constant after all,
> Davies' team resorted to the study of black holes, mysterious astronomical
> bodies that suck in stars and other galactic features.
> They also applied another dogma of physics, the second law of thermodynamics,
> which Davies summarizes as "you can't get something for nothing."
> After considering that a change in the electron charge over time would
> violate the sacrosanct second law of thermodynamics, they concluded that the
> only option was to challenge the constancy of the speed of light.
> More study of quasar light is needed in order to validate Webb's
> observations, and to back up the proposal that light speed may vary, a theory
> Davies stresses represents only the first chink in the armor of the theory of
> relativity.
>
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
>
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
>
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
>
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go
> tohttp://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
