Dont worry shanoj. 
 
when he  cannot understand the theory of Einstein , what he will do ? 
i request you also to stop sending  mails to this "fun " making platform . 
 
and this is my last mail . I am going to block the ID in my machine . 
 
regards 
sreenivas  
   

--- On Fri, 3/4/09, shanoj poduval <[email protected]> wrote:


From: shanoj poduval <[email protected]>
Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, 3 April, 2009, 3:18 PM



Dear all...
 
Green youth is becoming yet another platform to Make fun of each other.???????
Please stop it!
 
regrds 
Shanoj


On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:

Let me refer to collected works of Kuttichathan and find a way out for myself 
:-))) 





On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Anil M <[email protected]> wrote:


Damodar, u estimate or not but u have to help him find out which is true... 
Everything is possible or Nothing is impossible. (The Mumabi- Pune route is 
tricky. In Bheja Fry, Vinay Pathak. travels in a bus in the same route 
:))....Even Delhi philosophers couldn’t help him, since he is a non believer, 
god also can't help him. 




On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:11 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:

aayo..Funny Games changed my perception of the world. Hence, NO ESTIMATION. 





On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]> wrote:






if u want fun, help me clarifying one of my long standing doubt . 
i was travelling in a bus from mumbai to pune . inside the bus , it is written 
in a poster 
like this " Everything is possible" . 
 
but even after reading that poster repeatedly , i could not convince myself 
that everything is possible . everytime i say "everything is possible ", the 
impossibility of something haunted me . 
after reaching pune , i asked my friends . some people including me felt that 
it is better to say " nothing is impossible " but some were  of the opinion 
that " everything is possible " gives more confidence . 
we even discussed this with a professor of philosophy in delhi university but 
nobody could reach an agreement . 
this may see very silly to u but i am still confused .  

 
 
  
 
 


--- On Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:



From: damodar prasad <[email protected]>
Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:45 PM 





sorry, over-estimate!


On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:45 PM, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:

I don't want to underestimate you, sreenivas. Have fun! 





On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:37 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi Damodar , 
 
I wrote that as an introduction , I think three theories changed our perception 
about ourselves and the universe . 
1. Theory of relativity 
2. Marxism 
3. darwin's theory of evolution . 
the world before these men of genius has no singificance . 
 
 
 
--- On Thu, 2/4/09, damodar prasad <[email protected]> wrote:


From: damodar prasad <[email protected]>
Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Was Einstein Wrong?
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 2 April, 2009, 7:16 PM 





Srinivas,

like Marxism , another theory that changed our perception about the world was 
Einstein's theory of relativity .

did you write the above sentence?  or the sydney team.. 



On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, sreenivas v.p <[email protected]> wrote:






 It outhrown the newtonian conception of the world and lead 
to  revolutionary discoveries in the study of the universe . But was Einstein 
wrong ? 
See the below report . 
 
SYDNEY -- A team of Australian scientists has proposed that the speed of light 
may not be a constant, a revolutionary idea that could unseat one of the most 
cherished laws of modern physics -- Einstein's theory of relativity. 
The team, led by theoretical physicist Paul Davies of Sydney's Macquarie 
University, say it is possible that the speed of light has slowed over billions 
of years. 
If so, physicists will have to rethink many of their basic ideas about the laws 
of the universe. 
"That means giving up the theory of relativity and E-mc squared and all that 
sort of stuff," Davies told Reuters. 
"But of course it doesn't mean we just throw the books in the bin, because it's 
in the nature of scientific revolution that the old theories become 
incorporated in the new ones." 
Davies, and astrophysicists Tamara Davis and Charles Lineweaver from the 
University of New South Wales published the proposal in the August 8 edition of 
scientific journal Nature. (it also appeared in latest "Scientific american " 
magazine ).
The suggestion that the speed of light can change is based on data collected by 
UNSW astronomer John Webb, who posed a conundrum when he found that light from 
a distant quasar, a star-like object, had absorbed the wrong type of photons 
from interstellar clouds on its 12 billion year journey to earth. 
Davies said fundamentally Webb's observations meant that the structure of atoms 
emitting quasar light was slightly but ever so significantly different to the 
structure of atoms in humans. 
The discrepancy could only be explained if either the electron charge, or the 
speed of light, had changed. 
"But two of the cherished laws of the universe are the law that electron charge 
shall not change and that the speed of light shall not change, so whichever way 
you look at it we're in trouble," Davies said. 
To establish which of the two constants might not be that constant after all, 
Davies' team resorted to the study of black holes, mysterious astronomical 
bodies that suck in stars and other galactic features. 
They also applied another dogma of physics, the second law of thermodynamics, 
which Davies summarizes as "you can't get something for nothing." 
After considering that a change in the electron charge over time would violate 
the sacrosanct second law of thermodynamics, they concluded that the only 
option was to challenge the constancy of the speed of light. 
More study of quasar light is needed in order to validate Webb's observations, 
and to back up the proposal that light speed may vary, a theory Davies stresses 
represents only the first chink in the armor of the theory of relativity. 


Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 




Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 





Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 





      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to