---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marx Laboratory <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Subject: The Pentagon's Afghan Mineral Hype -A Pro-war PR Scam
To: Marx Laboratory <[email protected]>


*1.*
 The Pentagon’s Afghan Mineral Hype Unsilent Generation, June 14, 2010

This morning’s New York
Times<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html?pagewanted=all>includes
a story headlined, ”US Identifies Vast Riches of Minerals in
Afghanistan.’’ In fact the country’s  mineral wealth has been known for
centuries. Records of it date back to the time of Marco Polo. Mineral
stories were mapped by the Soviets during their occupation of the country,
and more recently by other mining experts. While it’s possible that the team
of Pentagon officials and American geologists credited with the “discovery”
may have added some detail to existing knowledge on the subject, it’s hardly
the revelation their reports–and the article–suggest.

So could this “revelation” in fact be an Obama administration PR campaign to
buttress U.S. involvement in the war in Afghanistan? For years, we were told
of Afghanistan’s potential valuable oil prospects. When oil faded from the
picture there was no economic reason to be there. The place wasn’t like
Iraq, where the international oil companies got their hands on a huge oil
reserve. But now, with the *Times* apparently swallowing the Pentagon’s
bait, we’ve suddenly got a new reason to fight: Getting our hands on a
lucrative mining colony. James Risen in the *Times* reports :

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral
deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough
to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself,
according to senior American government officials.

The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper,
cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and
include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that
Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important
mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.

An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become
the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of
batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.

The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small
team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government
and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said.

Running counter to the claims of a huge discovery is an existing undated
 report called *Minerals in
Afghanistan*<http://www.bgs.ac.uk/AfghanMinerals/docs/RareMetals_A4.pdf>,
prepared by the Afghan minining ministry  jointly with the British
Geological Survey and easily obtained on the web. The report has  this to
say on the subject:

In central Afghanistan occurrences of rare metals have been identified in
sediments below several lakes and depressions where lake brines contain
higher than average metal concentrations. Trial pits have indicated that
salt deposits covered by clay and loam layers contain high concentrations of
lithium, boron, lead and zinc.

In a 2006 special edition on Afghanistan of *Mining
Journal*<http://www.bgs.ac.uk/afghanminerals/docs/afghan_supp_final.pdf>,
pre-eminent publication in the field, the mining minister, Hon.Eng. Ibrahim
Adel, writes in the introduction,

It is a privilege for me to draw your attention to this *Mining
Journal *special
supplement on Afghanistan. Mining in Afghanistan has a history dating back
over 6,000 years, and despite all the upheavals over the past 25 years,
mining has continued to operate. The main task facing us now is to expand
the industry from its present small base. The Government regards the
development of Afghanistan’s natural resources as the most important driver
of economic growth, and essential to the reconstruction and development of
the country…For example, construction minerals production has grown
dramatically with the increased need for raw materials to feed road building
and reconstruction. I expect this will be followed shortly by further
investment in the coal, cement and hydrocarbons industries. The first signs
of grassroots mineral exploration for gold have started, and with the
appointment of Tender Advisors for the future development of the world class
Aynak copper deposit, I expect this to lead to really significant investment
in the mining sector of the economy in the very near future. Aynak is one of
the world’s largest undeveloped copper deposits and it has already attracted
interest from a wide spectrum of international companies.

*Mining Journal* provides an in depth account of the history and potential
for mining all sorts of minerals. Here is the *Journal*‘s overview:

Afghanistan has some of the most complex and varied geology in the world.
The oldest rocks are Archean and they are succeeded by rocks from the
Proterozoic and every Phanerozoic system up to the present day. The country
also has a long and complicated tectonic history, partly related to its
position at the western end of the Himalayas.

This diverse geological foundation has resulted in a significant mineral
heritage with over 1,400 mineral occurrences recorded to date. Historical
mining concentrated mostly on precious stone production, with some of the
oldest known mines in the world established in Afghanistan to produce lapis
lazuli for the Egyptian Pharaohs.

More recent exploration in the 1960s and 70s resulted in the discovery of
significant resources ofmetallic minerals, including copper, iron and gold,
and non-metallic minerals, including halite, talc and mica. The bedrock
geology of Afghanistan can be thought of as a jigsaw of crustal blocks
separated by fault zones, each with a different geological history and
mineral prospectivity. This jigsaw has been put together by a series of
tectonic events dating from the Jurassic up to the present.

Among other things, Afghan emeralds are generally considered to be among the
most beautiful in the world, rivaling the emeralds produced in Colombia.
They were mined and sold for arms during the time of the Northern
Alliance<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Alliance>;
the famous Mujahideen leader Ahmed Shah Massoud
<http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/emeralds-of-afghanistan/>funded
his campaign by selling emeralds from the Panjshir Valley. More recently,
sources with first hand knowledge of the business have reported that Afghan
emeralds were blocked by the Colombian emerald
cartel<http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/01/04/the_new_blood_diamonds>,
though there are reports of Afghan emeralds being traded on the sly through
Eastern Europe.

URL
http://unsilentgeneration.com/2010/06/14/the-pentagons-afghan-mineral-hype/

*2.
*
 *‘Discovery’ of Afghan Riches a Pro-war PR Scam?*
*--  A New York Times *report announcing the US has found $1 trillion-worth
of mineral deposits in Afghanistan has some observers wondering if the news
is part of a public-relations effort to bolster support for the Afghanistan
war as the mission's death toll continues to climb.

While the dollar estimate -- $1 trillion -- may be new, it's hardly news
that Afghanistan sits on rich mineral deposits. In a 2007 press
release<http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1819>,
the US Geological Survey announced that Afghanistan possesses "significant
amounts of undiscovered non-fuel mineral resources." And, as Marc Ambinder
reports<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/06/the-mineral-miracle-or-a-massive-information-operation/58104/>on
his
*Atlantic* blog, the Soviet Union was aware of Afghanistan's mineral
potential as early as 1985. “The ‘discovery’ of Afghanistan’s minerals will
sound pretty silly to old timers,” a "retired former senior US official"
tells Politico's Laura
Rosen<http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0610/Afghanistans_mineral_find_and_the_Washington_clock.html?showall>.
“When I was living in Kabul in the early 1970’s the [US government], the
Russians, the World Bank, the UN and others were all highly focused on the
wide range of Afghan mineral deposits. Cheap ways of moving the ore to ocean
ports has always been the limiting factor.”

So why is this news now? To many, the story's timing suggests a Pentagon
public relations campaign designed to extend public support for the war with
the hope that, in time, Afghanistan may be able to raise itself out of
abject poverty. "Why the story broke in the *NYT* on Sunday could be linked
to a desire by the Pentagon to create a reason why US troops might want to
stick around in Afghanistan for some time to come," writes Paul
Jay<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-jay/us-knew-about-afghan-mine_b_610829.html>at
the Huffington Post. "Things are not going very well on the ground and
the promise of vast mineral riches would sound enticing."

Some "veteran Afghan hands detect an echo of [Gen. David] Petraeus’ effort
to 'put a little more time on the Washington clock' for the Afghanistan
surge, as he once
described<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/08/AR2009020802321.html>his
public relations strategy to buy time in the US for the Iraq surge,"
Rosen reports.

Indeed, the US military's need to shore up support for the war effort may be
becoming critical. Recent news reports indicate that Afghan President Hamid
Karzai may have lost his faith in the US military's ability to carry out the
war. And Gareth Porter at IPS
reports<http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=51804>that US forces
are facing "the spectre of a collapse of U.S. political
support for the war in Afghanistan in coming months comparable to the one
that occurred in the Iraq War in late 2006."

That context leads blogger Steve
Hynd<http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2010/06/iraqs-mineral-riches-a-conveniently-timed-zombie-story.html>to
declare that the
*Times* piece is "a conveniently timed zombie story" that was "resurrected
yet again for political purposes."

Even if one were to take the *Times* story at face value, the practical
benefits of Afghanistan's mineral deposits are in doubt -- not least because
of the country's weak central government, corruption and a lack of skilled
labor.

"Under even the rosiest scenarios, it does not appear the new wealth will
change dynamics quickly enough in Afghanistan to aid the US military effort
there," reports Alan
Greenblatt<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127838998&ft=1&f=1004>at
NPR

*Extracted from July 15, 2010
"**RawStory*<http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0614/discovery-afghan-riches-prowar-pr-scam/>
*" *

====

*3.*

*Say What?
Afghanistan Has $1 Trillion in Untapped Mineral Resources?*

 A series of recent news stories has deeply damaged the Obama
administration's case for continued patience with U.S.-led counterinsurgency
campaign, which has shown little discernable progress despite the best
efforts tens of thousands of additional American troops and an all-star
lineup of top military officers. *Things don't look good for the United
States ... which makes me suspicious of the timing of this
attention-grabbing **James Risen
story*<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html?ref=global-home>
* in the Times, which opens with this mind-boggling lede:*

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral
deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough
to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself,
according to senior American government officials."

Wow! Talk about a game changer. The story goes on to outline Afghanistan's
apparently vast underground resources, which include large copper and iron
reserves as well as hitherto undiscovered reserves lithium and other rare
minerals.

Read a little more carefully, though, and you realize that there's less to
this scoop than meets the eye. For one thing, the findings on which the
story was based are online and have been since
2007<http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3063/fs2007-3063.pdf>,
courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. More information is available on the
Afghan mining ministry's
website<http://www.bgs.ac.uk/afghanminerals/raremetal.htm>,
including a report<http://www.bgs.ac.uk/afghanminerals/docs/RareMetals_A4.pdf>by
the British Geological Survey (and there's more
here <http://www.bgs.ac.uk/downloads/browse.cfm?sec=7&cat=83>). You can also
take a look at the USGS's documentation of the airborne part of the survey
here <http://afghanistan.cr.usgs.gov/airborne.php>, including the full set
of aerial 
photographs<http://afghanistan.cr.usgs.gov/flash_tile.php?cat=NRL%20Aerial%20Photography%20preliminary%20Data>.


Nowhere have I found that $1 trillion figure mentioned, which Risen suggests
was generated by a Pentagon task force seeking to help the Afghan government
develop its resources (looking at the
chart<http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals-graphic.html?ref=asia>accompanying
the article, though, it appears to be a straightforward
tabulation of the total reserve figures for each mineral times current the
current market price). According to Risen, that task force has begun
prepping the mining ministry to start soliciting bids for mineral rights in
the fall.

Don't get me wrong. This could be a great thing for Afghanistan, which
certainly deserves a lucky break after the hell it's been through over the
last three decades.

But I'm (a) skeptical of that $1 trillion figure; (b) skeptical of the
timing of this story, given the bad news cycle, and (c) skeptical that
Afghanistan can really figure out a way to develop these resources in a
useful way. It's also worth noting, as Risen does, that it will take years
to get any of this stuff out of the ground, not to mention enormous capital
investment.

Moreover, before we get too excited about lithium and rare-earth metals and
all that, Afghanistan could probably use some help with a much simpler
resource: cement.

According to an
article<http://www.bgs.ac.uk/AfghanMinerals/docs/IndustrialMineralsFinalArticle.pdf>in
the journal
*Industrial Minerals*, "Afghanistan has the lowest cement production in the
world at 2kg per capita; in neighbouring Pakistan it is 92kg per capita and
in the UK it is 200kg per capita." Afghanistan's cement plants were built by
a Czech company in the 1950s, and nobody's invested in them since the 1970s.
Most of Afghanistan's cement is imported today, mainly from Pakistan and
Iran. Apparently the mining ministry has been working to set up four new
plants <http://www.embassyofafghanistan.org/inbrief.html>, but they are only
expected to meet about half the country's cement needs.

Why do I mention this? One of the smartest uses of development resources is
also one of the simplest: building concrete
floors<http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/03/10_floors.shtml>.
Last year, a team of Berkeley researchers found that "replacing dirt floors
with cement appears to be at least as effective for health as nutritional
supplements and as helpful for brain development as early childhood
development programs." And guess what concrete's made of? Hint: it's not
lithium.

*UPDATE:* Missed this *Wall Street Journal
*story<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704905604575027673196231564.html>earlier.
Money quote:

[T]he Mines Ministry has long been considered among Afghanistan's most
corrupt government departments, and Western officials have repeatedly
expressed reservations about the Afghan government awarding concessions for
the country's major mineral deposits, fearful that corrupt officials would
hand contracts to bidders who pay the biggest bribes -- not who are best
suited to actually do the work

*Extracted from July 14, 2010 "**Foreign
Policy*<http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/14/say_what_afghanistan_has_1_trillion_in_untapped_mineral_resources>
*"*





-- 


You cannot build anything on the foundations of caste. You cannot build up a
nation, you cannot build up a morality. Anything that you will build on the
foundations of caste will crack and will never be a whole.
-AMBEDKAR



http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to