I know I'm replying essentially to myself again, but...

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:58:12 pm -0400, Henry So Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 05:01:48 pm -0400, Henry So Jr. wrote:
> ....  In addition, we should
> adopt the new oriscus deminutus into the greciliae, with the caeciliae
> shape as alternative....

I've changed my mind on this particular point.  Unless the oriscus
figure is changed as well, the oriscus deminutus looks too out of place
to me, so I don't think substituting this glyph alone is a good default.

However, feel free to shoot my opinion down.  I don't claim to be
particularly artistic.

Henry

_______________________________________________
Gregorio-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users

Reply via email to