On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:17:36PM +0100, Erik Romijn wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:06:04PM +0100, Erik Romijn wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:32:28AM -0500, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > > > perhaps an indexed array of peer IP/AS numbers. > > > > Nice idea. But how much would we save? > > [..] > > We save about 0.85Mbyte here. A RIS RIB dump on the biggest machine is > > 240M uncompressed. So we would save 0.35%. > > I'm mixing up again here. That RIS RIB dump is not 200K routes, that > would be a FIB dump. The RIB dump is approximately 30M entries.
No it's not, it's 3M entries. Without indexing 18MB of peer info data, with indexing 6MB. Save of 12MB of 240, so 5% saving. [Don't try to multiply numbers without a calculator right before lunch] cheers, -- Erik Romijn RIPE NCC jr. software engineer http://www.ripe.net/ Information Services dept.
pgpnhEtgoAat1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
