On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:01AM -0500, Larry Blunk wrote: > Here's my proposed format for the TABLE_DUMP_V2 type for comment.
Seeing your numbers on the RV dumps, it seems sensible to add this index. As I hope to increase the amount of routes per peer for RIS too, I suppose it will help us too in disk space savings. Note that in my calculations, I didn't check for any data saving due to saving the prefix fields only once per prefix. So I support this format, and will be implementing it for RIS. > 1 INDEX_TABLE A minor esthetical idea: wouldn't PEER_INDEX_TABLE be clearer, especially for future changes, if any? > 2 IPV4_UNICAST One possibly stupid, certainly not all too relevant, question: why is this called IPV4_UNICAST, while it also stores IPv6 entries? cheers, -- Erik Romijn RIPE NCC jr. software engineer http://www.ripe.net/ Information Services dept.
pgppmirCBOGLW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
