Hi Terry,
In my mind I could see (although not very clearly) why we need this
document and why it is important. I think that it would be a good idea some
kind of justification and what problem we are trying to fix.
Cheers,
as
On 21 Jun 2011, at 21:39, Terry Manderson wrote:
> Chairs and WG,
>
> I seek your feedback on the I-D below.
>
> I'd also like to present this to the WG in Quebec.
>
> Cheers
> Terry
>
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
>> From: <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:31:50 -0700
>> To: Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt has been
>> successfully submitted by Terry Manderson and posted to the IETF repository.
>>
>> Filename: draft-manderson-routing-intent
>> Revision: 00
>> Title: Signalling Public Routing Intent (PRI) for Internet Protocol
>> Addresses in IANA Registries
>> Creation date: 2011-06-22
>> WG ID: Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 12
>>
>> Abstract:
>> This document provides direction to IANA to mark existing and future
>> IANA IPv4 and IPv6 allocations with generic terms pertaining to the
>> Public (global) Routing Intent (PRI).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
