I have made those changes.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manderson-routing-intent-02.txt

Cheers
Terry


On 15/08/11 4:44 PM, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> So I saw no comments on this.
> 
> What I propose is that I add words to routing-intent-00 with the effect of
> adding an extra column to the IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address Registry
> listing the binary option for Public Routing Intent (PRI) to be consistent
> to the other IP address registries that acquire this column. The routing
> scope as defined by RFC5736 for the IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address
> Registry can remain as it is and can provide the (human) reader with more
> information for those entries in the special address registry.. because..
> well.. they are "special" ;)
> 
> If I see no objections to this I will make the change in the next day or so
> and publish a revision. Otherwise, please put forward a suggestion.
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
> 
> 
> On 15/07/11 11:32 AM, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> RFC5736 deals with only the IANA IPv4 Special Purpose Address Registry, a
>> registry that at present contains one entry for DS-lite.
>> 
>> There are two ways that the instruction for IANA contained in
>> draft-manderson-routing-intent-01 can be taken with respect to the IANA IPv4
>> Special Purpose Address Registry. Either add and additional column for
>> Public Routing Intent (PRI) or replace the existing routing scope column
>> with PRI. So a clarification is worthwhile.
>> 
>> There are arguments for both in uniformity versus simplicity and utility.
>> The latter option leaves the reader to investigate routing particulars (if
>> not intended to be globally routable) in the RFC which made the address
>> assignment.
>> 
>> Additionally it's also possible to add words to
>> draft-manderson-routing-intent to exclude the IANA IPv4 Special Purpose
>> Address Registry from acquiring change, as it already has a routing
>> designator.
>> 
>> What say you WG?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Terry
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 15/07/11 10:36 AM, "Geoff Huston" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> I seek your feedback on the I-D below.
>>> 
>>> To what extent does this draft further alaborate on part 7 of the list in
>>> the
>>> IANA Considerations of RFC5736?
>>> 
>>> To remind the WG, that document states that the registry includes:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 7.  The registry will also note, for each designation, the intended
>>>        routing scope of the address, indicating whether the address is
>>>        intended to be routable only in scoped, local, or private
>>>        contexts, or whether the address prefix is intended to be routed
>>>        globally.
>>> 
>>> So I'm left wondering what this I-D is trying to achieve over and above what
>>> is already
>>> in RFC5736?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>>   Geoff
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 22/06/2011, at 10:39 AM, Terry Manderson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Chairs and WG,
>>>> 
>>>> I seek your feedback on the I-D below.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd also like to present this to the WG in Quebec.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Terry
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------ Forwarded Message
>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:31:50 -0700
>>>>> To: Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc: Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>>>> draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt
>>>>> 
>>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt has been
>>>>> successfully submitted by Terry Manderson and posted to the IETF
>>>>> repository.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Filename:        draft-manderson-routing-intent
>>>>> Revision:        00
>>>>> Title:           Signalling Public Routing Intent (PRI) for Internet
>>>>> Protocol
>>>>> Addresses in IANA Registries
>>>>> Creation date:   2011-06-22
>>>>> WG ID:           Individual Submission
>>>>> Number of pages: 12
>>>>> 
>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>   This document provides direction to IANA to mark existing and future
>>>>>   IANA IPv4 and IPv6 allocations with generic terms pertaining to the
>>>>>   Public (global) Routing Intent (PRI).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>> 
>>>> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GROW mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Geoff Huston
>>> Chief Scientist, APNIC
>>> 
>>> +61 7 3858 3100
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GROW mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> 

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to