Hi Arturo, I'll see if I can be lucid in text and cover this aspect in the next version.
Cheers Terry On 24/06/11 11:20 PM, "Arturo Servin" <[email protected]> wrote: > Terry, > > Well, I think the document is very clear of what you want to do, but > what I suggest is to answer why we need to state in the registry the routing > preference. It might be obvious, but anyhow I think it would be good to say it > explicitly in the document (IMHO). I do not what the others think. > > Regards, > .as > > > On 23 Jun 2011, at 23:04, Terry Manderson wrote: > >> Hi Arturo, >> >> I'll reword the introduction to spell out the concern that the ipv4 and ipv6 >> address registries doe not explicitly state a routing preference. >> >> I think with that understand the rest should be clear to you? Or no? >> >> Cheers >> Terry >> >> >> On 24/06/11 10:37 AM, "Arturo Servin" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Terry, >>> >>> In my mind I could see (although not very clearly) why we need this >>> document and why it is important. I think that it would be a good idea some >>> kind of justification and what problem we are trying to fix. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> as >>> >>> >>> On 21 Jun 2011, at 21:39, Terry Manderson wrote: >>> >>>> Chairs and WG, >>>> >>>> I seek your feedback on the I-D below. >>>> >>>> I'd also like to present this to the WG in Quebec. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Terry >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ Forwarded Message >>>>> From: <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:31:50 -0700 >>>>> To: Terry Manderson <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Terry Manderson <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: New Version Notification for >>>>> draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-manderson-routing-intent-00.txt has been >>>>> successfully submitted by Terry Manderson and posted to the IETF >>>>> repository. >>>>> >>>>> Filename: draft-manderson-routing-intent >>>>> Revision: 00 >>>>> Title: Signalling Public Routing Intent (PRI) for Internet >>>>> Protocol >>>>> Addresses in IANA Registries >>>>> Creation date: 2011-06-22 >>>>> WG ID: Individual Submission >>>>> Number of pages: 12 >>>>> >>>>> Abstract: >>>>> This document provides direction to IANA to mark existing and future >>>>> IANA IPv4 and IPv6 allocations with generic terms pertaining to the >>>>> Public (global) Routing Intent (PRI). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>> >>>> ------ End of Forwarded Message >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> GROW mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >>> > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
