On 8/22/11 23:28 , Terry Manderson wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > > On 23/08/11 5:53 AM, "Pedro Torres" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dears, >> >> I don't know if GROW WG is the best place to suggest such > > My feel is that it is. So this is where I've started - I've emailed the > Chairs, AD, IAB, IETF separately to investigate. > >> modifications to IANA but I appreciate Terry I-D. >> Acctually we see these things in IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry: >> 192/8 Administered by ARIN >> 172/8 Administered by ARIN >> >> Was 192.168/16 or 172.16/12 allocated by ARIN? >> > > See RFC1918. ARIN was started in Dec 1997 from memory. So I think RFC1918 > predates ARIN. Those who were around then might be able to shed light. > (Although I think who came first is irrelevant to this draft)
As RC 1918 states the prefixes were allocated by IANA, 10/8 was the arpanet before it was shut off. You will note that one of the authors worked for the RIPE NCC which did exist at the time. >> I really appreciate the idea to show more specific allocations in this >> IANA document. >> I am not sure if the column PRI is the best way to do this but a new > > The PRI was the simplest option that is easy to understand I could come up > with. > >> way to show ALL IANA allocated prefixes with a reasonable designation >> could be nice. > > I think so too. > > Cheers > Terry > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
