Is there a way to do LFA when using VA? On Friday, April 20, 2012 12:16 AM, Xuxiaohu <> wrote:
>> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Russ >> White >> 发送时间: 2012年4月20日 10:48 >> 收件人: [email protected] >> 主题: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-va-06 >> >> >>> The WG has recently submitted draft-ietf-grow-va-06 for >>> publication. As part >> of my AD review, I looked for discussion of this draft on the >> mailing list archive. Excluding messages from >> [email protected] and the chairs, I see no >> messages posted over the last 12 months. The only messages that I >> see posted during the previous 12 months are: >> >> IMHO, this isn't one of the "best" ways to go about reducing table >> size. >> Note, however, that I have a "dog in this fight," since Alvaro and I >> are >> working on reviving an older idea that hopes to solve the same sorts >> of >> problems without the complexity of added BGP advertisements. > > Hi Russ, > > Would you explain why do you think the VA mechanism is complex? By > the way ,would you kindly disclose a bit of details of the older idea > that you mentioned? > > Best regards, > Xiaohu > >> So --my general feeling is the area of work is interesting, the >> mechanism proposed isn't the best available, and I'm ambivalent about >> the draft moving forward as an RFC right now. >> >> Russ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow -- Jakob Heitz. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
