Jakob, LFA operates at the IGP level .. VA operates at the BGP level. I am not sure what exactly you are asking about.
Thx, R. > Is there a way to do LFA when using VA? > > On Friday, April 20, 2012 12:16 AM, Xuxiaohu<> wrote: > >>> -----邮件原件----- >>> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Russ >>> White >>> 发送时间: 2012年4月20日 10:48 >>> 收件人: [email protected] >>> 主题: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-va-06 >>> >>> >>>> The WG has recently submitted draft-ietf-grow-va-06 for >>>> publication. As part >>> of my AD review, I looked for discussion of this draft on the >>> mailing list archive. Excluding messages from >>> [email protected] and the chairs, I see no >>> messages posted over the last 12 months. The only messages that I >>> see posted during the previous 12 months are: >>> >>> IMHO, this isn't one of the "best" ways to go about reducing table >>> size. >>> Note, however, that I have a "dog in this fight," since Alvaro and I >>> are >>> working on reviving an older idea that hopes to solve the same sorts >>> of >>> problems without the complexity of added BGP advertisements. >> >> Hi Russ, >> >> Would you explain why do you think the VA mechanism is complex? By >> the way ,would you kindly disclose a bit of details of the older idea >> that you mentioned? >> >> Best regards, >> Xiaohu >> >>> So --my general feeling is the area of work is interesting, the >>> mechanism proposed isn't the best available, and I'm ambivalent about >>> the draft moving forward as an RFC right now. >>> >>> Russ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GROW mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
