Folks, One week ago, I polled the WG in an attempt to gage interest in draft-ietf-grow-va. The following responses were posted:
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02231.html - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02233.html - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02235.html - http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02236.html I also received one private message referring to an IPR issues surrounding the draft. Of these five messages, two were opposed to publication of the draft, one asked a question, and only two could be interpreted as possibly supporting its publication. This exchange cannot be interpreted as strong WG support for publication of the draft. Therefore, I will transition this draft, and it helper, draft-ietf-grow-va-auto to the AD-WATCHING state. If anyone feels that there is strong WG interest in publishing this draft, they may ask the WG chairs to conduct another WG last call o demonstrate interest. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bonica > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: draft-ietf-grow-va-06 > > Folks, > > The WG has recently submitted draft-ietf-grow-va-06 for publication. As > part of my AD review, I looked for discussion of this draft on the > mailing list archive. Excluding messages from [email protected] > and the chairs, I see no messages posted over the last 12 months. The > only messages that I see posted during the previous 12 months are: > > - (Mar-17-2011) http://www.ietf.org/mail- > archive/web/grow/current/msg01850.html > - (Sep-20-2010) http://www.ietf.org/mail- > archive/web/grow/current/msg01748.html > - (Aug-23-2010) http://www.ietf.org/mail- > archive/web/grow/current/msg01726.html > - (Jun-23-2010 - Jun-26-2010) IPR Disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co., > Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-grow-va-02 and 14 > responses > > Given this, I need to gage the degree to which the WG is still > interested in the draft. > > Can anyone speak to the level of WG interest in this draft? As this is > an operational WG, I am especially interested in hearing from > operators. However, all views are welcomed. > > -------------------------- > Ron Bonica > vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
