On 23/08/2012 06:44, Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
> At IETF in vancouver we had a presentation from Russ White for a new
> working group item draft-white-grow-overlapping-routes-00. I would like to
> gauge the working group interest in adopting this draft as a working group
> item. Can people please voice their approval or disapproval.
I'm concerned by a lot of statements in this draft, particularly:
> Overall, then, it is desirable to remove overlapping routes from the
> global routing table where possible.
People inject prefixes into the DFZ for specific reasons. If they are
pruned by some upstream providers but not others, then the traffic
engineering model is broken because you can no longer depend on
more-specifics having visibility around the dfz. Or am I reading this
incorrectly?
Nick
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
