On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Peter Schoenmaker <[email protected]> wrote: > At IETF in vancouver we had a presentation from Russ White for a new working > group item draft-white-grow-overlapping-routes-00. I would like to gauge > the working group interest in adopting this draft as a working group item. > Can people please voice their approval or disapproval.
Hi Peter, What am I missing? The last few times this was discussed here or on RRG, RIB aggregation fell apart on the details. For example, what happens when: AS1 announces 10.1.0.0/16 from network A via ISP 1 and 2 AS1 announces 10.1.33.0/24 from network B via ISP 3 and 4 If the answer is: AS1 disaggregates 10.1.0.0/16 in order to avoid overlapping 10.2.33.0/24 because at least a couple folks implementing overlapping-routes broke network B then what is there to discuss? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
