Nick,

        Perhaps this is not the place, but ...

        I am still finding these arguments about RPKI as a bunch of fud (please
do not take it personally). I think that are much easier, cheap and
practical methods (or hammers) that would accomplish the same goal. In
fact, any entity trying to use RPKI as a hammer I would say that it is
very badly advised (to said the least).

Regards,
as



<snip>
On 14/11/2012 21:52, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>From a non-technical point of view I also have serious concerns about RPKI
> in terms of it being used as a hammer that politicians / bureaucrats / LEAs
> / judges / etc are (and that's "are" as in present tense) extremely
> interested in as a potential future means of blocking content / services
> which they happen not to like.  Although GROW is not the place for this
> particular discussion, this aspect of RPKI concerns me to the extent that I
> am disturbed about the wisdom of developing the technology in the first
> place:  we're building an on/off button for prefixes throughout the
> Internet.  We need to be careful what we wish for because one day, we might
> get it.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to